IPOB: We Say No To Sharia Law In Nnamdi Kanu's Case
By Mazi Nwabueze Hope Ikenna
For Family Writers
21st March 2017
The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) are appealing to the conscience of the world, friends of Biafra and lovers of freedom that the use of sharia law in the case trial of the leader of IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, a prisoner of conscience by the presiding Judge, justice Binta Fatima Nyako of Federal High Court Abuja Nigeria is a crime against fair justice to humanity. It is a somersault in the judicial principles and practice especially in a country governed by common law.
Justice Binta Nyako of the federal high court is a disgrace to legal profession in an expired contraption concocted by the British evil empire. How can a judge try a non-muslim with sharia law after searching for evidence to try him with common law (civil law) failed? As I ponder on the decision of the Presiding Judge Binta Fatima Nyako, permit me to say that it is a robbery of justice for her to think that the only solution she and her cohorts could think of, is the use of sharia law to judge Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in a Federal High Court and not a Sharia Court, knowing fully well that the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and others with him have been in detention by the illegal and unconstitutional DSS since October 14th, 2015 after two courts of competent jurisdiction ordered for his unconditional release.
Nigeria judiciary is in a very big mess that the president Muhammadu Buhari who didn't go to school or knows anything about law determines whether a person is guilty or not. This is further confirmed when tyrant Buhari went on National Television last year and pronounced the IPOB leader Mazi Nnamdi Kanu guilty when the law hasn't done that. He, Buhari vowed never to release the IPOB leader saying that Nnamdi Kanu has two passports- one British and the order Nigeria but came to Nigeria with none. Muhammadu Buhari is guilty of bigotry punishable under law, but who among the Judges in Nigeria can judge him when he parades himself as one who is above the law while it is clearly stated that no one is above the law!
I can fully understand how frustrated the Judge is on this case and I suggest she steps aside and hands off from this case because it is obvious that Binta Nyako has ran out of ideas on how to try the IPOB leader, if not on what basis will any learned, sensible and reasonable person try an innocent prisoner and non - Muslim with sharia law? I thought the Federal Republic of Nigeria is a member of Commonwealth nation? What happened to the common law? What similarities do Sharia law and civil law share? Is Nnamdi Kanu a Muslim? On what grounds will Judge Binta Nyako try him with sharia law? What of the six (6) count charges struck out by Binta out of 11 count charges? What need is the use of masked men to testify against the IPOB leader? The answers to these questions points out to a hidden agenda surrounding the presidency and the judicial arm.
Pathetically, Nigeria is a laughing stock among other countries. It is worthy to remember that the IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu made it crystal clear that Nigeria is an Islamic country which many people called him names because they couldn't read the hand writing on the wall. Till date Nigerians are being deceived to believe in one Nigeria while their rulers are full of lies and deceit. I don't think any reasonable person will take an expired contraption serious.
Nigeria and her Islamic presiding Judge Binta Nyako is a big disgrace to Commonwealth nation which they are members to. I cannot see how two legal systems- Civil law and Sharia law can work in one enclave, especially in a country that don't share the same value system. The point of the whole matter is that Judge Binta Nyako should not enforce sharia law on Biafrans who are non-Muslims and we refuse to be islamized. Nnamdi Kanu and Biafrans are the children of Chukwu Okike Abiama the supreme creator of heaven and earth.
This very idea/ tactics of Justice Binta Nyako to jail the IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu, a prisoner of conscience is not only laughable but abuse of fundamental human right of the accused. The shockable statement made by the Judge during the court proceeding on March 20th, 2017 that even if the the defending counsel Ifeanyi Ejiofor, likes let him fire 100 bail applications that the leader of IPOB must be tried with Sharia law, that he (Ifeanyi Ejiofor) should go and study sharia law; actually didn't come as a surprise to me because this frustrated judge is reading from scripts ordered by the tyrant Buhari to do his bidding or go to jail. It is also a clear indication that Nigeria judiciary is under the influence of a tyrannical humans, who think the solution to subjugate a race is to jail them to silence. But is very unfortunate for Justice Binta Nyako to be controlled against her profession. Soonest the heat will catch up with her and others supporting the use of sharia law against the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. One thing is sure and guaranteed that the restoration of the kingdom of Chukwu Okike Abiama Biafra is unstoppable and inevitable.
We still appeal to the conscience of the world, friends of Biafra and lovers of freedom to think twice about the doom that is bound to come if they fail to do the needful. Biafra people must be free and her leader must not be tried with sharia law because he is guilty of no crime.
Edited by Orji Munachimso
For Family Writers