The UN is mulling sending a military protection force to Israel to protect the ‘Palestinians’ from the Israeli Army

The UN is mulling sending a military protection force to Israel to protect the ‘Palestinians’ from the Israeli Army

By OE,NewsPoint

US opposition hasn’t stopped United Nations Security Council members from holding closed-door talks in New York about the possibility of sending a UN force to protect Palestinians in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza.

A Monday meeting on a draft resolution for such a force submitted by Kuwait ended without any conclusions.

The UNSC resumed talks on the Kuwait draft on Wednesday during its closeddoor session on the Middle East, which included the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The draft text “calls for measures to be taken to guarantee the safety and protection of the Palestinian civilian population in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in the Gaza Strip, including, inter alia, through the dispatch of an international protection mission.”

The United States, which is one of five permanent UNSC members with veto power, is expected to block any vote on such a text. European members of the UNSC are also likely to oppose the resolution in its current form.

British Deputy Ambassador to the UN in New York Jonathan Allen said his country had not yet taken a position on the matter. The UK also has veto power at the council.

 “We continue to negotiate with our colleagues in the council and, in particular, to get more information about what precisely is intended by a protection mission, what that means, and we will carry on having those negotiations,” Allen told reporters.

“At this stage, we will need to have more detail about what is planned and what is proposed, and that is not yet clear to me. And when we get to a point of clarity, we will decide what to do,” he said.

Bolivian Ambassador to the UN in New York Sacha Sergio Llorenty Soliz told reporters his country backed the resolution.

“We believe it is time for the international community to uphold its responsibility in terms of protecting Palestinians. We hope that sooner than later we will have a draft on the floor to be voted on,” said Soliz.

When asked by reporters about the US role, he said, “We expect from every single member state to uphold international law and to comply with resolutions of the Security Council, but it seems that they [the US] believe they are above international law.”

The idea of an international protective force for Palestinians comes after almost eight weeks of violent Palestinian riots along Gaza’s border with Israel.

Hamas has claimed that IDF soldiers killed 102 Palestinians during the demonstrations, which have been dubbed the “Great March of Return,” during which protesters tried to tear down the border barrier and cross into Israel.

Israel has highlighted the violent nature of the protests, which included stones, Molotov cocktails, flaming kites and infiltration attempts. The Palestinian have charged Israel with attacking peaceful protesters at events that drew thousands of Gaza residents.

Last week, the US blocked UNSC efforts to condemn IDF actions on the Gaza border and to launch an investigation. On Friday, the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, where there is no veto power, voted 29-2 to dispatch a commission of inquiry into IDF actions on the border. On Tuesday, the Palestinian Authority submitted information on Gaza border violence and Israeli settlement activity to the International Criminal Court.

Should Kuwait fail in its UNSC drive, the PA is likely to turn to the General Assembly on the issue.

The draft text of the resolution strongly condemns “the use of force by the Israeli occupying forces against Palestinian civilians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and particularly in the Gaza Strip, in violation of international humanitarian law, international human rights law, and relevant resolutions and expresses its sorrow at the loss of innocent lives.”

Follow us on twitter ( @_ezemba )

UN Army
One Nigeria, One Big Corruption: The British Made "Nigeria" that is Riddled with Corruption Has Expired and Ripe for Break-up
Nigeria Logo vs Biafra Logo

What are we waiting for? Isn’t it very obvious even to the daftest that the contraption called Nigeria is a failed state by every definition and every parameter? Is this what a country of 186 million people supposed to be? Should we continue to sustain a country that is unsustainable?
Details of 1914 Amalgamation of Nigeria
Map of Nigeria
Sir Frederick Lugard’s Confidential Memorandum on the Administration of Nigeria
Which of President Muhammadu Buhari are you referring to? The dead one or the imposter?
Buhari Double

President Muhammadu Buhari died a long time ago, the current one parading as a president is a “product of plastic surgery or mask-over.”
The Atrocities of Nigeria Islamic Army on Christians in the South East of Nigeria
Killing Unarmed 02
The Atrocities Committed on Defenceless Christian Civilians in Abia State, South East, Biafra Land by Nigeria Islamic Army
Comparing Singapore as a Lesson for Biafra
Don't get me wrong, Singapore is a nice country to be compared with Biafra. If one day Biafra becomes like Singapore I will be very glad indeed.
Meaning of Igbo in Nigeria’s Geopolitics
Meaning of Igbo in Nigeria’s geopolitics
Depending on where one is standing, in Nigeria, the name Igbo is a compound word that includes many ethnic groups heaped together.